Good
dreams and bad dreams
Our
dreams are conceptualised by a few individuals and institutions. The concepts
are tossed in the air, and left to float. As the ideas hang in the air for
quite long, we read, internalise and then own them as our own. So after a while
we start desiring about those dreams, and loose eons of good sleep over not
able to fulfil these dreams.
Two
things that come up in my mind, let me start with the first: are these our own
dreams? When I was young did I dream about it? For example, while on my way to
Mumbai from Nasik, I read the hoarding saying ‘impossible dreams made possible’
showing ‘home loans and car loans’ It implied that the bank knew about my (and
my other class fellows’) dreams. It is not the only bank telling you that your
big home-2-3bhk apartments, bungalow, second home, and all that can be made
possible with a small loan from the bank.
And
mind you, we could really be dreaming about driving in a car to our own house,
and drinking tea, and relaxing on the sofa. The picture perfect!
But
are these our dreams? If the answer is affirmative, then rest assured, the
banks will have a good top line-bottom line (and all those pretty figures) and
you will be spending more time in the office working to augment your earnings,
and at home, working on your finances.
If
the answer is affirmative, and it is, it means we have stopped dreaming about
our own dreams, and outsourced these to the financial institutions, at a
premium. It also means we have been horded into believing that all our dreams
are common-without any individual characteristic attached to the dream. It also
means we have stopped thinking about ourselves and left it to others to think
about the most important things in our life. Pathetic?
The
second question is more fundamental, and it pertains to the changing
definitions, perceptions, concepts of the dreams, and, this is paramount, the
reality-check on the access to homes!
During
our growing years we all lived in homes, and never dreamt of having our own
homes (at least I did not). For every individual home is the need, (where one
goes after working in the field, office, or spending time with friends and
relatives) and as good as or on par with a square meal. One doesn’t dream about
day-to-day needs unless these have become exotic, too sparse to acquire, and
hard to find.
One
needs a car to commute to work place, and if the public transport is good,
there is no need of using a car. But even where the public transport is bad, as
in Mumbai (getting into the local is bad but getting out is worse!) the
unidirectional traffic renders the use of car useless. So buying and keeping
the car parked at your place is a luxury, and a liability.
Here
we are not discussing the utility of the car as a commuting medium. No, we can
do it later; owning a car is a dream looks like we have become barren at the
ideating level.
Over
the years, have we substituted insular ambitions with dreams? Larger houses,
bigger cars, second homes, and all these are insular ambitions (or these were a
few years back). Are we confusing insular ambition with dreams? (This is for debate!)
If
the ‘state of affairs’ has become so that we have to dream about a house (as
most of the people from cities and metros do), it is serious, and as a
community, we are doomed. We could be industrious, but it tells on the
governance and the policies of the state that the needs have been turned into
dreams. Today I was reading Hindustan Times, in which Dhirendra Kumar writes,
“Naidu pointed to the obvious anomaly that despite a housing shortage of 19
million units, there are around 11.09 million houses vacant in urban areas.”
So
against this backdrop if we dream about a house, it is a bad dream, if at all
we dream about a house! For, we are forced to dream about the house.
Our
energies, at least the youth of the country’s talents should be channelized for
more-better-diverse dreams. Those dreams could be anything, from gardening, to
playing an instrument, from writing to scaling the mountains. These are good
dreams, and a culture needs to be cultivated, nurtured where the youth is free
to think and decide about her/his dreams. Not that the youths are not doing
this, but the percentage could be minuscule while the vast majority is moving
with a monkey on the back on a railed road, boot-straps stringed to the
rails.
No comments:
Post a Comment